Skip to content

LETTER: Eliminating library fines about avoiding confrontation

'Cavalier dismissal of revenue is astounding' reader says in reaction to Guelph Library's loss of $200K in late fees
2021-10-14 books PEXELS
Stock image

GuelphToday received the following letter to the editor from reader Ed Gilpin in response to our story A year later, Guelph Public Library not hurt by end of late fees.

I am compelled to respond to the report quoting Michelle Campbell that the elimination of library fines was a “great decision” and the loss of $200,000 was “never really a huge amount”.

Such a cavalier dismissal of revenue is astounding.

I doubt that the library system is operating without this amount as the taxpayers can be counted on to replenish the loss.

Besides missing an opportunity to promote responsibility – i.e. return what you borrow on time and take care of what you use – the fiscally naive decision to eliminate fines to promote usage is misleading.

Library usage is predicated on the desire to read, not avoiding penalties. Fines are not a barrier to usage because they are avoidable.

If the concern was that low-income families could not afford fines, then continue to collect the fees and donate a portion of the $200,000 to the food bank or another worthy social project.

I suggest the real reason was the desire to avoid confrontation between library staff and late paying patrons.

Give in to the bread and circuses, O Tempora O Mores.

Ed Gilpin, Guelph