Skip to content

The results are in...here are your favourites!

The top three have been crowned in GuelphToday's Reader Favourite program
0
readerfav_shop_2000x1333_GT

GuelphToday readers have chosen their favourites, casting countless votes for what they see as the top three businesses and organizations in Guelph.

The GuelphToday Reader Favourite program allows you, the reader, to choose the businesses and organizations that you think deserve top honours in our community.

The Top Three businesses and organizations, as voted by GuelphToday readers are:

1. Pressed for Time Paninis

2. Synergy Sport Therapy

3. Guelph-Wellington Women in Crisis

Congratulations to the Top Three! 

Each of the Top Three businesses will receive a $2,000 advertising package with GuelphToday.

While the Top Three contest is now complete, you can still help your favourite business or organization become a Reader Favourite by giving their profile a "like" in our Local Business Directory.

Each business that surpasses 50 “Likes” will become a GuelphToday Reader Favourite and receive a celebratory package from GuelphToday.

Liking is easy!

Visit our Local Business Directory (or visit our “Shop” menu), find the business you would like to vote for and hit the “❀️Like” button on the top left corner of the listing page.

By liking, you are helping local businesses and organizations become a Reader Favourite and acknowledging their outstanding service or products. 

Make sure you are signed in to your GuelphToday account to vote. If you don't have a GuelphToday account, signing up for one is free, quick and easy. Click here to create a user account and get voting!

Having trouble finding a business or organization in the directory that you would like to vote for, or need a listing update? Email directory@guelphtoday.com

Thank you to all who voted and congratulations again to the winners!

*Businesses and organizations do not need to be advertisers with GuelphToday to be included in our directory and eligible for the Reader Favourite program.

 




Comments